[ Home page ]   [ Publications and Preprints ]   [ Curriculum vitae ]

Walter Schachermayer

The Limitations of No-Arbitrage Arguments for Real Options.

F. Hubalek, W. Schachermayer
International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, Vol. 4 (2001), No. 2, pp. 361-373. [R]


We consider an option c which is contingent on an underlying S~ that is not a traded asset. This situation typically arises in the context of real options. We investigate the situation when there is a 'surrogate' traded asset S whose price process is highly correlated with that of S~. An illustration would be the cases where S and S~ model two different brands of crude oil. The main result of the paper shows that in this case one cannot draw any non­trivial conclusions on the price of the option by only using no arbitrage arguments.

In a second step we try to isolate hedging strategies on the traded asset S which minimize the variance of the hedging error. We show in particular, that the naive strategy of simply replacing S~ by S fails to be optimal and we are able to quantify how far it is from being optimal.


[PostScript (599 k)] [PS.gz (139 k)] [PDF (164 k)] [DOI: 10.1142/S0219024901001024]

Publications marked with [R] have appeared in refereed journals.

[ Home page ]   [ Publications and Preprints ]   [ Curriculum vitae ] [ Publications adressed to a wider audience ]

Last modification of static code: 2016-11-18
Last modification of list of publications: 2017-07-31